abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Historia

Saudi Arabia: Companies respond to Business & Human Rights Resource Centre's new report on exploitation of Nepali & Bangladeshi workers on renewables projects

In October 2025, the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (the Resource Centre) launched its new report, '“We were treated as if we were machines”: Migrant workers powering Saudi Arabia’s energy transition', analysing working conditions for migrants employed on renewable energy projects Saudi Arabia.

Grounded in interviews with Nepali and Bangladeshi workers, the report found a litany of human rights violations across nine renewable energy projects in Saudi Arabia, with over half of interviewees experiencing five or more indicators of forced labour. The report also analysed the human rights commitments of companies with business connections to the projects, and the responsibilities of banks financing the projects. Read the full report here.

Forty-one companies were included in the report due to their business connections to five named projects. This includes:

  • Seven companies linked to abuse through supply chain connections: ACWA Power, the Public Investment Fund, Saudi Aramco, NEOM and Air Products are developers on at least one of the five projects. These companies selected construction and engineering contractors, Larsen & Toubro and/ or PowerChina, to construct elements of the renewables projects, which then employed migrant workers – either directly or through subcontractors – in abusive working conditions. Most interviewees were employed in the supply chain of Larsen & Toubro.
  • Nine companies working on the projects, but workers were not interviewed in their supply chains. These companies were included due to their presence on their project, and hence exposure to risk: Saudi Electricity Company and NEOM contracted Hitachi Energy and Saudi Services for Electro Mechanic Works to develop NEOM’s energy transmission system; SPG Steiner and local partners MAN Enterprise and Almajal Alarabi Group were contracted to construct ammonia storage tanks at NEOM; Thyssenkrupp and De Nora partnered in a joint venture to engineer and maintain NEOM’s water electrolysis modules; and Archirodon is building an ammonia jetty at NEOM
  • Twenty-five banks financing the projects named in the report: Standard Chartered, Riyad Bank and Mizuho Financial Group (financed all five projects); Banque Saudi Fransi, Saudi National Bank, HSBC and Saudi Awwal Bank (financed four projects); Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Arab Petroleum Investments, First Abu Dhabi Bank and Korea Development Bank (financed two projects); and Abu Dhabi Commerical Bank, Al Rajhi Bank, Alimna Bank, Bank Al Bilad, Bank Aljazira, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, DZ Bank, Emirates NBD, JPMorgan Chase, KfW, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Natixis, and The Norinchukin Bank (financed one project).

Ahead of the report's launch, the Resource Centre invited these companies to respond to the report's findings. Additionally, the Resource Centre invited companies with supply chain connections to abuse and financiers to disclose any steps they will take to investigate the abuses and ensure timely remediation.

By the time of the report's publication, responses were received from 15 companies: BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, De Nora, DZ Bank, Hitachi Energy, HSBC, KfW, Larsen and Toubro, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Mizuho Financial Group, SPG Steiner, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, The Norinchukin Bank, and Thyssenkrupp. Their responses can be read in full below.

Respuestas de la empresa

De Nora Ver respuesta
Hitachi (part of Hitachi Group) Ver respuesta
Larsen & Toubro Ver respuesta
SPG Steiner Ver respuesta
Thyssenkrupp Ver respuesta
BNP Paribas Ver respuesta
Crédit Agricole Ver respuesta
DZ BANK Ver respuesta
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Ver respuesta
Mizuho Financial Group Ver respuesta
Standard Chartered Ver respuesta
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Ver respuesta
The Norinchukin Bank Ver respuesta
ACWA Power

Sin respuesta

Air Products

Sin respuesta

Almajal Alarabi

Sin respuesta

Archirodon

Sin respuesta

MAN Enterprise

Sin respuesta

NEOM Co.

Sin respuesta

PowerChina (Power Construction Corporation of China)

Sin respuesta

Public Investment Fund

Sin respuesta

Saudi Aramco

Sin respuesta

Saudi Electricity Company

Sin respuesta

Saudi Services for Electro Mechanic Works (SSEM)

Sin respuesta

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank

Sin respuesta

Al Rajhi Bank

Sin respuesta

Alimna Bank

Sin respuesta

Arab Petroleum Investments (APICORP)

Sin respuesta

Bank Al Bilad

Sin respuesta

Bank Aljazira

Sin respuesta

Banque Saudi Fransi

Sin respuesta

Emirates NBD

Sin respuesta

First Abu Dhabi Bank

Sin respuesta

JPMorgan Chase

Sin respuesta

Korea Development Bank (KDB)

Sin respuesta

Natixis

Sin respuesta

Riyad Bank

Sin respuesta

Saudi Awwal Bank (SAB)

Sin respuesta

Saudi National Bank

Sin respuesta

Línea del tiempo